Smokable hemp regulations likely won’t come before FDA’s broader CBD rules, attorneys say

, Smokable hemp regulations likely won’t come before FDA’s broader CBD rules, attorneys say

Catch up on all the hemp analysis from the Hemp Industry Daily Forum at MJBizCon2020 here.

Hemp flower growers and smokable hemp manufacturers impacted by state laws that have banned or restricted smokable hemp flower production and sales are worried that federal regulators could echo state-level restrictions on a national scale.

But according to cannabis industry attorneys, industry members can put those fears to rest, as it’s unlikely that the industry will see any federal regulations on smokable hemp products until the U.S. Food and Drug Administration – or Congress – issues regulations for hemp-derived CBD as a category.

“Right now, it’s arguably not under FDA’s jurisdiction,” said Ashish Talati, a partner with Chicago law firm Amin Talati Wasserman.

“It’s not nicotine; it’s not tobacco; so where does it really fall under? I don’t see them regulating it any time soon at all,” Talati said during the Hemp Industry Daily Forum at MJBizCon 2020.

California-based cannabis attorney Emily Leongini, an associate with Arent Fox and former FDA attorney agreed, saying the agency has “too many other things on their plate right now.”

“Even if they wanted to exercise jurisdiction creatively … I can’t imagine it will be anytime soon,” Leongini said.

To date, at least seven states including Texas, Iowa, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Hawaii and New York have banned smokable hemp. At the end of its 2020 legislative session, a CBD regulation bill in California included language that would have banned smokable hemp; however, that legislation did not make it to the floor for a vote in time.

State bans on smokable hemp products don’t necessarily mean federal authorities will institute bans or restrictions on the sector, according to hemp industry insiders. But it doesn’t mean federal food and drug authorities won’t try to regulate them, either.

Smokable hemp flower in its raw form is most closely monitored by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. As long as crops remain compliant with the federal limit of 0.3% THC, it’s unlikely the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration will take notice of the category, cannabis industry attorneys say.

“Once the product transitions from the harvested commodity to a smokable product intended for human consumption, it would arguably transfer over to the FDA’s jurisdiction,” said Garrett Graff, a cannabis attorney for Denver-based Hoban Law.

Thus far, the FDA has not made any policy statements or enforced any existing regulation under the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act against smokable hemp products, according to cannabis attorney Shawn Hauser, a partner with Denver-based law firm Vicente Sederberg.

“The FDA has cited the need to further study various methods of intake of CBD, including smoking and vaping, as a necessity in determining its ultimate regulatory approach for hemp-CBD products, indicating that it may ultimately exercise regulatory authority over these product types,” Hauser said. “The FDA has also recently prioritized regulation and enforcement of e-nicotine devices.”

But a federal smokable hemp ban isn’t likely anytime soon, according to Jonathan Havens, a cannabis attorney and partner with the Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr law firm in Washington, DC.

“In fact, even federal product restrictions could be a ways off, unless the FDA considers such products to be drugs or tobacco products,” Havens said.

Down the road, the FDA will likely provide further clarity around smokable and inhalable hemp products, he said.

Vape issues

In light of the vape crisis of 2019, the USDA might be more concerned in the near-term future with CBD vapes than loose smokable hemp flower or derived products.
Consider:

  • The FDA has tested CBD vape cartridges in its 2014-18 sampling pool, and it plans to continue to test these products.
  • The FDA expressed concern in its March 2020 report to Congress that CBD vapes “pose public health risks” because vaping “raises toxicity concerns—both inherent to the substance and due to potential contaminants—and could attract children and adolescents, which are vulnerable populations.”

The FDA’s March report contained an entire section on vaping, suggesting the agency is thinking about the topic as broadly as possible, including regulating CBD vapes as tobacco products or, if appropriate, as drug products.

More specifically, the FDA told Congress in March that, in addition to its “general public health concerns about vaping and CBD, vape products containing CBD that meet the definition of tobacco products will be regulated as such and cannot be marketed without FDA premarket authorization.”

Further, the FDA said CBD-containing vape products cannot be tobacco products, will be regulated as drugs and can’t be marketed with FDA-approved drug applications.

The FDA said more safety data and research is needed to earn “potential implications” from the use of vape products.

“On the drug regulation front, as we have seen with ingestible CBD products, if marketers make therapeutic claims, especially aggressive ones, we might (or) could expect the FDA to take enforcement action,” Havens said.

Tobacco rules

Meanwhile, the FDA’s regulatory regime for tobacco is broad, with its definition including “any product made or derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption.” Unless smokable hemp products are mixed with tobacco or nicotine derived from tobacco, or include a component, part or accessory of a tobacco product, the tobacco definition would not apply.

However, an accessory means any product “intended or reasonably expected to be used with or for the human consumption of a tobacco product.” So, if hardware, for example, isn’t intended to be used with or for the consumption of tobacco, the FDA could still regulate it as a tobacco product if it’s “reasonably expected” to be used for the same purposes.

Given the broad definition of tobacco products and the FDA’s clear indication that “CBD-containing vape products meeting the definition of tobacco products will be regulated as such,” it is possible the FDA could take action against such products absent the agency’s premarket authorization (which is not easy or inexpensive to achieve).

“To the extent a marketer is selling a CBD vaping product that can only be used for that purpose, for example, it’s not a cartridge-based system in which a CBD cartridge could be swapped out for an e-liquid cartridge, the FDA would have a hard time arguing it’s a tobacco product,” Havens said.

The FDA could still decide to take an interest in smokable hemp if they think the products will be attractive to minors.

Smoking cessation

Entrepreneurs in the smokable hemp space should be careful not to make claims about their products in marketing collateral, such as positioning them as smoking cessation products.

“To the extent a smokable product was deemed to violate drug provisions or tobacco provisions, the FDA still has the authority to regulate that,” Havens said.

There are two ways that the FDA has talked about regulating smokable or inhalable products:

  • As a tobacco product.
  • As a therapeutic or drug product.

But FDA regulates smoking-cessation aids as drug products, Havens said.

“So if you’re making smoking-cessation claims and to the extent you don’t have approval from the FDA to market it as such, which I imagine, folks who are making those claims with CBD or hemp products don’t,” he said. “Then, yes, you might expect that the FDA would say you’re marketing an unapproved drug product.”

Download the free report “Sector Snapshot: Opportunities & Challenges in Smokable Hemp” for more detailed analysis of the smokable hemp market.

Laura Drotleff can be reached at [email protected]

2 comments on “Smokable hemp regulations likely won’t come before FDA’s broader CBD rules, attorneys say
  1. C.A. on

    It makes absolutely no sense to ban smokable hemp flower products while at the same time allowing smokable cannabis flower products.
    I would compare it to banning non-alcoholic beer because regulators claim it’s too similar to regular beer. It’s completely asinine.
    There is good demand for low/no-THC smokable hemp flower, just as there is good demand for low/no-alcohol beer. Smokable hemp flower is a viable product that has genuine market demand. Regulators need to be more forward thinking. By banning it, they will only empower foreign competitors and lose market share domestically and internationally.
    Not only are foreign competitors allowing smokable hemp flower products, but they are increasing the maximum THC percentage in the flower to be at a more reasonable 1%THC.
    Regulators in the U.S. should foster, aid, and promote small independent smokable hemp flower entrepreneurs and their small independent companies. Instead regulators are still in the prohibition-era, and in a self-defeating regressive mindset.
    To regulators who favor banning smokable hemp flower products I say :
    Progressive, realistic, and more forward-thinking FOREIGN COMPETITORS are going to eat the U.S.A’s lunch in the domestic and especially global (smokable hemp flower products) marketplace.
    It is not too late to reverse the damage done by Texas, Iowa, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Hawaii and New York.
    California especially disappointed me in their recent attempt to ban it as well. California has always been the most modern, innovative, and independent of all states, so I find it extremely disappointing that they too are not seeing the reality of this situation, and are not respecting the legitimacy of this product.

    Reply
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *