10 things the hemp industry wants most from the USDA

The hemp industry wants faster rule-making, immediate hemp-transportation laws that were promised under the 2018 Farm Bill, common national THC-testing standards and an end to restrictions on imported seed in time for the 2019 season.

Those were some of the top requests in the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) webinar this week to solicit public comment on hemp and the 2018 Farm Bill.

“We do understand the importance of this crop and how much interest there is in growing this crop for the 2020 season,” Sonia Jimenez, deputy administrator for the USDA-Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) Specialty Crops Program, said during this week’s webinar.

More than 2,100 people watched the webinar, the second one held by the USDA about hemp, including state agriculture commissioners, industry attorneys and advocates, hemp farmers, bankers, insurance professionals and various ancillary business owners.

Several Native American tribes were also represented. They asked the USDA to make immediate provisions for tribal participation in the 2019 planting season.

Among the most common requests for the USDA from the hemp industry:

  • Expedient creation of the rules so that states and tribes can develop production and enforcement plans for the 2020 season, because once these rules are released, states will still need time to implement changes.
  • Immediate rules to allow for interstate commerce of hemp, instead of waiting until the hemp-growing rules are final.
  • Uniform THC post-harvest testing. Hemp entrepreneurs asked that hemp shipments be sealed and not retested to preserve the integrity of the initial tests and protect farmers.
  • USDA acknowledgement that plant stressors can cause THC levels to increase.
  • Common standards for THC testing labs to ensure that testing practices don’t vary by lab or by state.
  • An end to restrictions on seed imports in time for the 2019 hemp planting season, which is just around the corner.
  • Common national hemp-production license fees.
  • Development of best production practices and funding for crop consultants and other resources to successfully launch hemp as a viable agricultural industry.
  • Crop insurance and access to other federal financial resources for the 2019 growing season.
  • Cooperation between the USDA and other federal agencies agencies to clarify the rules and the roles for each agency under the 2018 Farm Bill.

Hemp states like Colorado, Kentucky and Tennessee offered to help the USDA make national rules, saying that their states’ rules could be implemented on a national scale – and the agency doesn’t need to reinvent the wheel.

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue said last month that the USDA would postpone review of state and tribal hemp plans until the agency had finished the rule-making process for the 2020 season.

AMS Administrator Bruce Summers reiterated that the USDA will aim to complete its hemp production regulations by fall 2019, in time for states to submit their plans for the 2020 spring hemp planting season.

The public has three more weeks to submit comments to [email protected].

The USDA Agricultural Marketing Service will address comments and questions on its website, where a recording of the webinar will be posted by March 18.

Laura Drotleff can be reached at [email protected]

Subscribe to our Newsletter

2 comments on “10 things the hemp industry wants most from the USDA
  1. Donna Simon on

    Absolutely, here in NC is a big issue with those things you are addressing. CBD Isolate is another issue that needs to be taken care of threw the FDA. Farmers need a place for their product to go. If you don’t have a place for is to be sold then what’s the point?

    Reply
  2. RayCA. on

    I feel strongly that the Hemp Industry Regulators need to develop and implement a Social Equity Program to assist in the development of minority hemp farmers.
    The cannabis industry has begun doing so, and I think it is correct and appropriate for the Hemp Industry to do likewise, but bigger and better, since there is less legal ambiguity with hemp now.

    Thank you.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *