California bill to allow hemp CBD-infused products fails

A California proposal to allow hemp extracts in food and beverages has again failed amid broad disagreement on how to allow cannabinoids outside licensed marijuana retailers.

The bill would have also set testing and labeling requirements for safety, and to ensure products don’t exceed 0.3% THC levels. But California legislative leaders did not schedule the bill for a vote before the session’s conclusion Monday night.

The bill’s failure leaves in place California’s 2018 policy banning CBD in foods and drinks.

Asssemblywoman Cecilia Aguiar-Curry, one of the legislation’s sponsors, had said allowing the sale of CBD-infused products would help boost the state’s economy, especially during the ongoing COVID-19 epidemic.

The bill would have also given the state’s health department the authority to license and register food manufacturing facilities for hemp-infused products.

The U.S. Hemp Roundtable, a national advocacy group, said in a statement it was “profoundly disappointed” the bill failed.

But several hemp producers in California worked against the measure and cheered its failure, saying the requirements were too onerous for products made from a legal crop.

State lawmakers did send to the governor two major pieces of legislation important for marijuana operators. Lawmakers passed:

  • Assembly Bill 1827, which freezes the state’s ability to raise tax rates until July 2021.
  • Assembly Bill 1525, which guarantees financial institutions won’t face repercussions from the state for granting services to marijuana companies.

For more stories about hemp in California, click here.

5 comments on “California bill to allow hemp CBD-infused products fails
  1. Global Hemp on

    With regards to the following statement, it would be nice if you would list their names, “But several hemp producers in California worked against the measure and cheered its failure.”

      • Josh Schneider on

        The bill was pushed by out-of-state interests and the Big THC. Hemp farmers worked against it because it outlawed the sale of smokable flower; banned the importation of out-of-state genetics; banned clone production; banned import of out of state flower; specified new and impossible compliance testing; created a giant new bureaucracy; increased fees and gave more responsibility to the utterly inept CDFA/CDPH for rules and enforcement.
        On the upside it did what the big CBD players wanted- categorized CBD as a dietary supplement. The companies behind this bill neither engage in farming hemp in California nor buy hemp from California farmers.

    • Wayne Richman on

      You want names? Happy to discuss, call the California Hemp Association office. Ask for Wayne Richman, the Executive Director. We cheered it’s failure! And we will kill any bill that does not include farmers in the creation of the legislation. CHC, HIA, VoteHemp, US Hemproundtable all conspired to screw California hemp farmers and processors. There are some names for you to watch out for if you support farmers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *