Hemp State Highlight: Oregon positioned for national dominance with tested products

, Hemp State Highlight: Oregon positioned for national dominance with tested products

(This is the third installment in a series that looks at hemp markets in U.S. states over the next few months. Other installments: ColoradoNevadaNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth Dakota TennesseeVermont and Virginia.)

When it comes to hemp, Oregon is no little brother to its more populous neighbors to the north and south.

Washington state bans hemp production for high-value CBD products, and California is headed toward a patchwork of local hemp regulations. Meanwhile, Oregon is poised to become a national hemp leader.

Oregon has a well-established network of hemp growers and processors, plus a sweeping new testing regime.

The new testing law requires hemp producers to give their products the same testing as marijuana, meaning Oregon hemp products will be food-grade quality and tested for pesticides and contaminants. The new testing law took effect Oct. 6.  

It could position Oregon hemp products for national dominance, a prospect that isn’t lost on farmers in and out of the marijuana business.

“We’re bringing more farmers in every day,” said Courtney Moran, a Portland attorney who represents hemp growers and serves on the Oregon Industrial Hemp Rules Advisory Committee.

Here’s what you need to know about Oregon’s hemp market.

Industry snapshot

Oregon has authorized hemp cultivation since 2009. But the state’s Department of Agriculture didn’t license the first hemp grower until 2015, after Congress expressly authorized states to allow hemp.

The Oregon hemp industry has grown exponentially in just two years. As of 2017, Oregon has:

  • 233 licensed hemp growers
  • 170 licensed hemp processors, called “handlers”
  • 119 licensed producers of viable hempseed
  • 3,500 outdoor acres licensed for cultivation

The state requires separate licenses for growing and processing hemp, though some businesses hold both. Each license costs $1,300 a year.

Oregon also issues a license for producing viable hempseed. Those permits cost $120 a year and must be held in conjunction with a growing or processing license.

The state has no background check requirements for hemp growers or processors. But hemp producers are subject to the nation’s most exhaustive testing requirements, with 100% of registered hemp fields tested for THC content.

Oregon allows hemp production for:

  • CBD extraction
  • Seed or seed oil
  • Fiber

Even though Oregon allows seed and fiber production, nearly all the hemp growers are raising plants for CBD extraction. The state has a limited number of hemp growers pursuing seed production, and no known processors for fiber.

“I don’t even know where you’d sell fiber,” said Jerry Norton, head of the Oregon Hemp Growers Association and a Salem-based hemp grower.

Market considerations

There is no official tracking of hemp commodity prices by any standard exchange. Oregon hemp growers surveyed by Marijuana Business Daily report that the market is fetching:

  • $100 or more per pound of dried flowers or buds for use in CBD extraction. As in other states, prices vary widely based on CBD content. One large processor pays $10 per pound per CBD percentage, meaning that flower product at 13% CBD would fetch $130.
  • Less than 50 cents per pound for seeds to be eaten as food products or pressed for seed oil.
  • No reliable price per pound for stalks to be turned into fiber, because the market is so limited. In 2016, the state studied the prospect of using hemp stalks and other hemp products in animal feed, but the Department of Agriculture decided it was too risky, making that use off-limits for Oregon hemp producers.

Market changes

A new hemp-testing law in Oregon could change the market significantly.

The law requires hemp-derived products destined for human consumption to undergo the same strict product-testing requirements as commercial marijuana. That means no pesticides and no significant contaminants.

“Our food products are not tested as critically as our hemp,” said Sarah Bennett, director of Odyssey Hemp, a Portland hemp sales and distribution company.

, Hemp State Highlight: Oregon positioned for national dominance with tested products

Jerry Norton, a hemp farmer and head of the Oregon Hemp Growers Association, says “the Oregon name means something” in hemp circles. (Photo by Kristen Nichols)

Hemp-derived CBD products sold in Oregon will also have to carry labels guaranteeing their CBD content, similar to how marijuana products carry THC content labels.

The changes are huge, representing the first statewide requirements of their kind in the nation. And the Oregon hemp industry supported them.

“We saw issues with products coming from other states, other countries, that were loaded with pesticides,” Moran said. “We want to make sure that nothing like that is coming out of Oregon.”

Oregon’s new testing requirements took effect in October, and the state has not estimated how the changes could affect prices. A fiscal analysis prepared for state lawmakers projected the change would cost the Oregon Department of Agriculture about $50,000, which “may result in an increase in fees.”

Producers aren’t sure what that means for consumers, though some warn that fee hikes will be passed on to consumers.

Potential CBD price hikes are “a concern when at the end of the day most people are consuming CBD for its medicinal value” and are sick, Bennett said.

Still, Oregon hemp growers are betting that their state is positioning itself for strong nationwide growth as other states expand hemp and marijuana law and consumers seek assurances the products they’re buying are safe.

“The Oregon name really means something, and that’s only going to be more and more valuable moving forward,” Norton said.

Oregon could also find itself serving as a template for other hemp states, Bennett said.

“In California and Washington, that evolution is going to occur, and they’ll be looking to Oregon,” she said.

Kristen Nichols can be reached at [email protected]

4 comments on “Hemp State Highlight: Oregon positioned for national dominance with tested products
  1. George Bianchini on

    Great to see Jerry doing so well in Oregon. We Hemp farmers here in California wish him the best and are glad to see Oregon in the news for something. Of course that changes next year as California ramps up its Hemp production. We tend to do things differently here in sunshine state. One thing that just developed is that some Counties will harvest your legal Hemp grow for you at no charge. One case in point. Our ( San Joaquin County)26 acre DEA compliant with Research oversite and Dept of Agriculture paperwork filed at the grow site was harvested (stolen) by the Sheriff three days before harvest time. And has since disappeared from wherever they took it as evidence. While we feel that most California Sheriff’s do obey the laws of the State, some good old boys, still have this “not in my town” attitude.
    Below is a little about a $77 million lawsuit we filed to thank them for lending a hand (25 officers, two big rigs with D8 monster tractors) to harvest for us. Thanks!
    The Complaint is filed in response to the Defendants entering onto the Plaintiffs’ property and seizing their industrial hemp harvest and alleges: (1) Violation of Supremacy Clause/Preemption [U.S. Const. art. VI, cl. 2]; (2) Unconstitutional Vagueness [U.S. Const. am. 5, 14]; (3) Unlawful Bill of Attainder/Ex Post Facto [U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 3]; (4) Violation of Fifth Amendment – Procedural Due Process; and, (5) Violation of Fourth Amendment – Unlawful Seizure [42 U.S.C. §1983]. The Complaint requests for the following:
    • Temporary Restraining Order/Immediate Stay of Enforcement;
    • Return of Property Seized;
    • Preliminary Injunction;
    • Permanent Injunction;
    • Declaration re: Ordinance Is Void;
    • Declaration re: Search Warrant Is Void;
    • Declaration re: Seizure Was Unlawful;
    • Compensatory Damages; and
    • Punitive Damages.
    The Complaint alleges that the Defendants: (a) drafted San Joaquin County Ordinance 4497 (the “Ordinance”) specifically to criminalize the Plaintiffs’ existing industrial hemp harvest; (b) determined the Plaintiffs violated the Ordinance; and, (c) enforced it by seizing the Plaintiffs’ grow, with an estimated value of US $77 Million, without affording them an opportunity to meaningfully present their arguments to a judge or other neutral fact finder. The Plaintiffs further contend that the Defendants committed this violation of the separation of powers in the form of an emergency ordinance so the Plaintiffs would not have enough notice or opportunity to become compliant and based on a multitude of inaccurate facts. The Plaintiffs contend that they have all of the required permits, exemptions, approvals and authorizations necessary, but, regardless, these actions are unconstitutional

    • Mike on

      Hi George sorry about the loss of your crop, I wish you luck with the law suit,
      I love hemp and just do not understand the ignorance that surrounds it.

  2. Pam on

    Sue for trespassing, no warrant anything you can, go for ownership of those D8’s… go for their money!
    Never thought the NIMBY title would extend to ranch country as it has.
    Our freedom loving neighbors call task force every other week on our licensed 502 grow in Washington state. They sit on their veranda laughing, drinking beer all night long then drive home while they call a false complaint to the task force.
    NIMBY has always been associated with city folk being too righteous for their postage stamp home lot. Now we have NIMBY ranchers using local law enforcement to destroy their neighbors.
    At least the city NIMBY’s have a conversation before a mass protest.
    So I say, yay for Oregon and the citizens of that great State. Their reasoning is light years ahead of California and Washington.
    Apologies for brashness but, Cali will be lucky if they can get their policy straight within the next 10 years, too many people live in that sunshine state for things to go smooth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *